|
Contact: Laura Holden
Three Rivers Workforce Investment Board
412.552.7089
Printable
(PDF) version
Managing the
Changing Workforce in Southwestern Pennsylvania:
A closer look at issues related to our regions
aging workforce
Pittsburgh, PA (April 20,
2006) A new study has confirmed what many
here have suspected: that the workforce in the
Pittsburgh region is somewhat older than the workforces
of comparable regions. It also supports the belief
that if it hadnt been for the loss in population
following the steel industry decline in the 1980s,
the regions population would be much younger
today. Against this backdrop and the uncertainty
related to projections of population growth or
decline that extend to the next 25 30 years,
strategic workforce planning faces enormous challenges.
But taking no action could be risky since the
upshot may be a competitive disadvantage for the
region.
In partnership with Carnegie
Mellon Universitys Center for Economic Development,
the Three Rivers Workforce Development Board has
conducted a study of the industries impacted by
the aging demographics of our region. This research,
partially funded by the Heinz Endowments through
the Regional Workforce Collaborative of Southwestern
Pennsylvania, utilizes the following sources:
Local Employment Dynamics (LED), a data source
developed by the U.S. Census Bureau; industry
surveys of employers; and input from various industry
experts. The results of this study will help define
the problem for the region and inform various
constituencies about the workforce situation across
industries and within those that are particularly
vulnerable to workforce shortages. It will also
be used to craft appropriate solutions by Employers,
Policy Makers, Educators, and Training Providers.
We have become accustomed
to viewing the region as homogenous and old. This
line of thinking leads to seeing workforce problems
that may not exist along with inefficient planning
and policy making. This study offers some new
perspectives about the issue including: The region
is not homogenous in terms of the demographic
composition of the workforce. Based on a new Census
data tool, this study identified industries that
were likely to have older workforces. The follow-up
qualitative survey explored the employer perspective
among these selected industries.
This study offers regional stakeholders a different
perspective and a better understanding of the
definition and scope of the problem such as:
- Industries are not equally
old. They represent a mix of ages and other
demographics.
- Not every firm in industries
with a high concentration of older workers fit
an industry-wide pattern; some firms have a
relatively high concentration of younger workers.
- Even some young
industries have large pockets of older
workers that are approaching retirement.
- For some industries, having
a higher concentration of older workers doesnt
pose a problem and may be an advantage.
Based on percentage (not
number) of older workers, some of the oldest industries
in SWPA include: mining, petroleum and coal products,
utilities, primary metals manufacturing, transit
and ground passenger transportation, and air transportation.
On the other hand, our data analysis suggests
that the transit and ground passenger transportation
industry, although an industry characterized by
an older workforce, does not necessarily have
an overarching problem. The picture for other
industries was either mixed (primary metals manufacturing),
or inconclusive due to insufficient information
(air transportation, petroleum and coal products).
Strategies to address the
issue of replacing older workers, while uneven,
are gaining strength. Several organizations, for
example, in the mining and utilities industries
have implemented programs that deal with replacing
retiring workers. Through the forums and regional
discussions sparked by this study, we will issue
additional findings about some of the creative
approaches and lessons learned from employers.
Study Method and Application
Study results will be released
in installments on the web site of The Three Rivers
Workforce Investment Board. The 1st installment,
Introduction, Methodology and Key Findings is
available at www.trwib.org.
- Introduction, Methodology
and Key Findings
- In-Depth Industry Profile:
Mining, Petroleum, Coal Products Manufacturing
- In-Depth Industry Profile:
Utilities
- In-Depth Industry Profile:
Primary Metals Manufacturing
- In-Depth Industry Profile:
Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation,
Air Transportation
- Executive Summary &
Recommendations
In addition, a series of
forums will be conducted with interested organizations
to further examine the issue from a number of
vantage points including employers, industry
specialists, individual organizations, policy-makers,
and workforce professionals so that the
region is well positioned to deal with shifting
demographics. For the purposes of this study the
southwestern Pennsylvania region is defined as
a nine county region including Allegheny County,
Armstrong County, Beaver County, Butler County,
Fayette County, Greene County, Indiana County,
Washington County, and Westmoreland County.
Study Partners
The Three Rivers Workforce
Investment Board
The Three Rivers Workforce
Investment Board (TRWIB) is an employer-driven,
policy-making entity for Pittsburgh and Allegheny
County. Board members, appointed by the Mayor
of Pittsburgh and the County Chief Executive,
share a concern about workforce quality and the
availability of good jobs in the region. The 1998
federal legislation that consolidated employment
and training programs, The Workforce Investment
Act, also created local workforce investment boards,
including the TRWIB.
Center for Economic Development
The CED is affiliated with
the H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy
and Management at Carnegie Mellon University.
Established in 1968 and renamed in 1992 in honor
of the late U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania, the
Heinz School improves the ability of the public,
private and non-profit sectors to address important
problems and issues facing society.
|